About Raichu ...
I feel sorry for asking too much during months a really change for raichu, cuz it was honestly a really bad pokemon, but having a good experience at pvp it was at least usefull against some water pokemons, his only problem was the low damage it has and nothing else should have changed at all, but in the change of this pokemon, it was like a full change that really modified it diferent of community expectation. When i firstly saw it i said OMG why play nice? but didnt know this move was like moonblast and with the echoied voice repared, this pokemon turned into a beast.
It's well know by players that this raichu is right now the best electric pokemon and not exactly cuz its well balanced,it just has no enemy able to defeat it. I feel sad cuz even pokemon like gliscor 130 or any other ground pokemon always ends red or sometimes dead by this pokemon, now that reflect reflects the damage and not the move, its every easy for raichus users to deal some good damage against steelix for example or gliscors mud...
Last time i was defending raichu but after over 100-150 duels using this pokemon and playing against it, as one of the most active pvp for years, i can say,
Raichu is just abit more Op of the pokemon i thought was the Ultima OP ever made [Gardevoir].
First combo with double team, 2 MOVES [ECHOIED VOICE + PLAY NICE] = 10,367 hp.
Second combo without double team 2 MOVES[ Volt tackle + SHOW WAVE] Total= 9227
This combo is very easy to use because with wild charge or even with roar, moving raichu up while other cant follow him, makes him able to hit 4-6 times with show wave, sometimes in 2x, only this move can take 80-90% life of any water pokemon or flying.
Now in a battle against a gliscor or any other Ground pokemon, their hp is around 20-22k hp in all pokemons grounds.
So look how raichu only with his Non-electric is able to make red a gliscor, pokemon that is right now one of the best ground pokemons, some pokemons like Quagsire, Shiny Quagsire or Whiscash doesnt survive at this combo because his hp is 19-20k something that should be also be at rebalancers review list cuz this is a shit of life.
Total damage of these moves is 14,000 points ... and if raichu reflects mud or sandtomb, gliscor would be dead ...
Another problem this pokemon have is that with volt tackle + thunder is able to paralize enemy, it can easily stay attacking from far and with his modified moves at damage like thunder bolt, thunder shock, electro ball, shock wave, its very easy for him to defeat almost anything and gain some time to recover CD, CDs that if someone look, are very shorts.
My suggestion for this pokemon is :
Moves:
Thunder Shock - m1 - level 40 - 10s
Growl - m2 - level 42 - 30s
Electro Ball - m3 - level 40 - 15s
Thunder Bolt - m4 - level 40 - 15s ->20S
Echoed Voice - m5 - level 40 - 25s -> 35s
Thunder - m6 - level 40 - 30s
Play Nice - m7 - level 40 - 30s -> 40s
Shock Wave - m8 - level 45 - 40s
Parabolic charge - m9 - level 55 - 25s
Double Team- m10 - level 55 - 50s
* without volt tackle this pokemon wont be paralizing enemy too much, this is the move that let him execute the op combo with show wave almost always 100% effectivity, also this move let him stay far or target , letting him recover all his movesets.
He can paralize with thunder so it wont be useless after this change, and with grow he can make this combo but with more dificult, likt it suppused to be... Also this move is very annoying for everyone, pokemons that move slows like kangaskhan or blisseys, has no chance to defeat raichu even if he doesnt have reflect or any TM, all cuz this move.
* Without Electric Charge it will finally stop making OP play nices and very high damage, it suppused to have the best damage already in his electric moves... with this extra buff, its just stupidy to believe the damage he can make.
* Without ultra very short cds at his playnice and echoied voices, moves that hit 4k+ hp, it wont be able for him to repeat them 2-3 times in a 1 Vs 1 PVP.
Anyone that has played pvp knows about the op of this pokemon, its very stupid to fight against this argument, if someone does, please give arguments [if you have one].[/FONT]