Decreasing low pokemon's level.

[rakeri]

We get option which allows us to decrease level of our pokemon for 50hd. It's usefull, but only for higher levels.
There is no sense in decreasing 20 level pokemon to 19 for 50hd, but lower players want to use this option aswell.

My opinion is to change charge for decreasing:
x = 0,5*y + 10
where:
x - Charge
y - Level of pokemon before deacrese



lvl 20 - 20 HD
lvl 30 - 25 HD
lvl 40 - 30 HD
lvl 50 - 35 HD
lvl 60 - 40 HD
lvl 70 - 45 HD
lvl 80 - 50 HD
lvl 90 - 55 HD
lvl 100 - 60 HD
lvl 110 - 65 HD
lvl 120 - 70 HD
lvl 130 - 75 HD

MATELUS IDEA:

20 HD for a level 20 is much cash =s
and 75 for a level 130 is very cheap, and remember, low levels players will use this system more than high level

Change the formula for these:
x= (y.y)/100

This mathematics formule will make a parable crescent, will facilitate for newbies and will hamper for HLs

Level 20 = 4 HD
Level 50 = 25 HD
Level 100 = 100 HD
Level 130 = 169 HD

 

[Comatose]

mmm I think that its ok, yes for a low lvl its dificult to get money, but, when some one is low lvl have more options to lvl up and the pokemon htat pass the player lvl can be used again, i think no need changes

 

[rakeri]

mmm I think that its ok, yes for a low lvl its dificult to get money, but, when some one is low lvl have more options to lvl up and the pokemon htat pass the player lvl can be used again, i think no need changes

Actually don't agree with you. Low levels always got 1-2 pokes which are 10 lvl higher than them. This change is neccesary imo.

 

[mateus79]

really, a lvl 17 dont have 50 hd to decrease the level of his gloom from 28 to 27 ='[

 

[Maritos]

In my opinion, it should be free, cause you are already losing a level. Unless this can be abused somehow, but nothing comes to my mind now

 

[Khan]

In my opinion, it should be free, cause you are already losing a level. Unless this can be abused somehow, but nothing comes to my mind now

Oh there's plenty of ways to abuse this. Players can lvl only one Pokemon all the time which means they'll lvl up faster like only leveling at desert quest with an umbreon, or ditto at gengar castle or fearow at Laguna island. This way players can get lvl way faster (on their characters) and do quests

 

[Vengo]

Oh there's plenty of ways to abuse this. Players can lvl only one Pokemon all the time which means they'll lvl up faster like only leveling at desert quest with an umbreon, or ditto at gengar castle or fearow at Laguna island. This way players can get lvl way faster (on their characters) and do quests

I don't see whats abusive there, we are talking about low lvl players, so I don't think that someone will use Umbreon Ditto or Myght~... Even if they find a way to abuse the sistem, the consequence's are slightly... Also who would pay 50hd to decrease a lvl to a pokemon which is worth like 30hd+-, so it is pointless... Why to remove a lvl if I can buy another poke for the same price...

 

[rakeri]

Oh there's plenty of ways to abuse this. Players can lvl only one Pokemon all the time which means they'll lvl up faster like only leveling at desert quest with an umbreon, or ditto at gengar castle or fearow at Laguna island. This way players can get lvl way faster (on their characters) and do quests

The prices wouldn't be so low as you think:

lvl 20 - 20 HD
lvl 30 - 25 HD
lvl 40 - 30 HD
lvl 50 - 35 HD
lvl 60 - 40 HD
lvl 70 - 45 HD
lvl 80 - 50 HD
lvl 90 - 55 HD
lvl 100 - 60 HD
lvl 110 - 65 HD
lvl 120 - 70 HD
lvl 130 - 75 HD

Wanted to buy some pokes for my brother which will let him fast exp (Arbok, Tangela etc.)
He is 23 level, so I could buy only max 33 lvl of poke or buy higher (most of them were 45,50+) and pay like 1000hd only to decrease their levels.

 

[Maritos]

Oh there's plenty of ways to abuse this. Players can lvl only one Pokemon all the time which means they'll lvl up faster like only leveling at desert quest with an umbreon, or ditto at gengar castle or fearow at Laguna island. This way players can get lvl way faster (on their characters) and do quests

I see, good point

So I agree with the proposal

 

[papuchi]

well...maybe they can do that...but tey are loosing money and exp...I mean...I think it's better to buy another pori or umbreon low lvl and hunt with it. We all know that theese pokes grow its price really cool for each level,a porigon lvl 70 may cost 3k or less and a pori lvl 80 cost more than 4k. and people who can afford having a porigon 130 or umbreon 130,i think they have cash for buying another low lvl. SO,if they prefeer to decrease lvl and only have 1 poke it makes no sense to me...So it can be free,or at least,like rakeri suggested. It's my opinion

 

[Maritos]

I just heard a way to abuse from it, so I don't think the idea will be implemented

 

[rakeri]

I just heard a way to abuse from it, so I don't think the idea will be implemented

How could it be abused?

 

[mateus79]

We get option which allows us to decrease level of our pokemon for 50hd. It's usefull, but only for higher levels.
There is no sense in decreasing 20 level pokemon to 19 for 50hd, but lower players want to use this option aswell.

My opinion is to change charge for decreasing:
x = 0,5*y + 10
where:
x - Charge
y - Level of pokemon before deacrese



lvl 20 - 20 HD
lvl 30 - 25 HD
lvl 40 - 30 HD
lvl 50 - 35 HD
lvl 60 - 40 HD
lvl 70 - 45 HD
lvl 80 - 50 HD
lvl 90 - 55 HD
lvl 100 - 60 HD
lvl 110 - 65 HD
lvl 120 - 70 HD
lvl 130 - 75 HD

20 HD for a level 20 is much cash =s
and 75 for a level 130 is very cheap, and remember, low levels players will use this system more than high level

Change the formula for these:
x= (y.y)/100

This mathematics formule will make a parable crescent, will facilitate for newbies and will hamper for HLs

Level 20 = 4 HD
Level 50 = 25 HD
Level 100 = 100 HD
Level 130 = 169 HD

 

[Maritos]

How could it be abused?

A high level can use a noob char to decrease for less money.

 

[rakeri]

A high level can use a noob char to decrease for less money.

I meant about Pokemon's level, not player.

 

[Maritos]

I meant about Pokemon's level, not player.

Ah
Makes more sense now