and thats absolutely ok, not all pokes are suposed to have 2 stuns or have similar movesets, imagine how boring would it be, I showed the good part of kingler that is having good aoe moves already, would be op for spawns if he had 2 stuns to hold and hit them with his aoe moves, its just my opinion that kingles is absolutely ok
I totally disagree with you. Don't try to play the "Not-all-pokes-are-supposed-to-have" card here. There is a reason why there is a rule: 2 stuns max per pokemons. How come you think it is "fair" or "well-balanced" when there are pokes who have protect + 2 stuns or pokemon, like Medicham, with 2 stuns in its moveset + can learn Reflect + can learn 1 more stun (3 in total), and then there are pokes like Kingler.
Stun-moves are useful. It is not about whether it would be boring or not for pokes to have similar stuns. As I said, it is about practicality.
I also believe Kingler's moveset is good. However, as Lewuseq was suggesting,
it would be nice if they can either remove the TM restriction, or add some Stun-move to Kingler's moveset.
Kingler Tsunami's move is the weakest AoE, maybe you could replace that one, in case you decide to add stun to kingler.