I guess the point is that rewards that have been added recently are not as good as the ones from original list. I cant remember what was the original ones but judging by the last 20~ rewards from actual list I cant tell they're wrong. For example, in first 130 rewards we have 13 shinies and 15 cloneds, while in last 20 we have 0 shinies and 1 cloned
Ive played this game long enough and knocked my head on the wall while arguing on forum enough times to understand acting like people did on this thread is not the best way to address to this matter, or any matter, but that doesnt change the fact they have a point. This was actually theme of a meme some time ago
Dont get me wrong, Im not really worried about lotteries at all (Ive won like 1 good thing in over 45 tries), but I understand people's frustration about getting lesser chances of getting great rewards after paying the price (its all about the risk/benefit after all). If I were to suggest anything I would define quotas for "op rewards", "great rewards", "good rewards", "average rewards" and "shit rewards" (or something like that) and increase the number of each quota proportionally