Im 100% sure that this opinion is made by garkstal and you just help him posting it, i suppose that he remember his participation on Oricorio's thread that was not objective like this thread.
Well, about your post i think actually that palossand is pretty fine now,there are pokes like ludicolo,bisharp,abomasnow,dewgong and all the pokes dark that can defeat easily than their usually weakness. I'm going to explain with some pokes that i consider too strong that we need to adapt to them:
Primeape. Come on this poke can defeat easily a poke psy or ghost, if i were a new dueler, i would take out a psy or ghost poke, for this reason i always carry klefki to defeat it.
Shiny Ludicolo/ludicolo. This poke can defeat easily flying pokes, if i were a new dueler, i would take out a fly poke but for this reason the best option are for example naganadel and toxicroak because this thing can kill anything in dmg x1 too, i think that since it has teeter dance, it becomes so strong.
Jolteon. This poke can defeat most of the pokes in dmg x1, if you want to defeat this poke with a ground poke and you dont want that your poke stay in red hp after defeating it, the best options are palossand, golurk, and steelix. I havent finished to understand why it has wish, it was too much.
Finally it has the chance to learn Rock Polish against ice and having Sandstorm in moveset.
I dont think that i need to explain this because there are many pokes that have more than 2 moves for their weakness like that i mention Primeape , it can has 4 moves in total plus counter, also an similar poke that is similar gastrodon that is inmune to water and has harden too, it has ice beam and can learn blizzard.
Finally, If the rebalancer team considerate that Palossand is OP, i think that the pokes that i mentioned ludicolo, primeape, jolteon, should be nerfed too because it would be unfair if older pokes than the poor palossand are not nerfed.